The SAPIEN 3 platform addresses the key drivers of reintervention

All patients being considered for lifetime management deserve proven durable outcomes.

Lowest rate of TAVR reintervention in a pivotal trial1

Image of chart showing durability of SAPIEN 3 TAVR compared to surgery
Graphic with text of 5 years in reference to real-world data

The Edwards SAPIEN 3 platform has demonstrated excellent durability

The PARTNER II S3i intermediate-risk trial and PARTNER 3 low-risk trial demonstrated:
  • SAPIEN 3 valve durability similar to surgery at 5 years1,2
  • Low rates of structural valve deterioration (SVD) and SVD-related bioprosthetic valve failure, similar to surgery at five years1,2
Real-world data have demonstrated:
  • Excellent five-year SAPIEN valve durability performance for small-annuli patients3

Watch Dr. Hahn’s Late Breaking Clinical Trial & Science presentation from New York Valves 2024

Watch Video
Durable outcomes through 5 years icon

SAPIEN 3 TAVR: a therapy with durable outcomes through 5 years, including for small annulus and female patients

  • Excellent clinical outcomes
  • Low rates of reintervention
  • Sustained quality of life through 5 years
Download Presentation

Contemporary TAVR Research: How do we make outcomes more patient oriented?

See multiple scientific perspectives from leading experts in the field on contemporary TAVR outcomes and how they can impact both your practice and your patients living with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Edwards Sponsored Symposium at NY Valves in New York, NY on June 6, 2024.

Stay connected

Be the first to receive the latest news in transcatheter heart valves, including event announcements.

References:   1. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in low-risk patients at five years. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(21):1949-1960. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2307447. 2. Pibarot P, Ternacle J, Jaber WA, et al. Structural deterioration of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve bioprosthesis in PARTNER-2 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:1830-1843. 3. Okuno T, Tomii D, Lanz J, et al. 5-year outcomes with self-expanding vs balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with small annuli. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16(4):429-440. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2022.11.032. 4. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695-1705. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1814052.