The only valve optimally designed to keep future options possible

Image of graphic showing excellent real-world results for continued coronary access

The SAPIEN 3 valve is designed to facilitate future coronary access1

Excellent real-world results for continued coronary access

  • 0.1% (n=1324) coronary obstruction after SAPIEN 3 valve implantation2
  • 100% (68/68) success post-TAVR coronary access 1
Image of graphic showing design to host future valve reinterventions

Designed to host future valve reinterventions

Preserving future coronary access is a key consideration in valve-in-valve patients3,4

  • SAPIEN 3 valve-first TAVR reduces risks of future sinus sequestration*4
  • SAPIEN 3 valve-first TAVR facilitates favorable coronary access4

*Risk of sinus sequestration if (1) prior TAV commissure level above STJ and (2) the distance between TAV and STJ was <2.0mm in each coronary sinus.

The only platform indicated for both TAV-in-TAV and TAV-in-SAV procedures

Image of valve
Image of valve

Death and Stroke for TAVR with the SAPIEN platform (Native vs Redo)5

Image of chart demonstrating death and stroke outcomes
Image of chart demonstrating death and stroke outcomes

Delivering similar outstanding procedural outcomes§ and experience as the index procedure

For patients assessed at high-risk for surgical valve replacement.
§Reported death and stroke.
There are limited data evaluating safety and efficacy of redo-TAVR.

Stay connected

Be the first to receive the latest news in transcatheter heart valves, including event announcements.

References:   1. Tarantini G, Fovino LN, Le Prince P, et al. Coronary access and percutaneous coronary intervention up to 3 years after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable valve. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(7):e008972. 2. Nazif TM, Cahill TJ, Daniels D, et al. Real-world experience with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra transcatheter heart valve: a propensity-matched analysis from the United States. Circ Interventions. 2021; 14:e010543. 3. De Backer O, Landes U, Fuchs A, et al. Coronary access after TAVR-in-TAVR as evaluated by multidetector computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(21):2528-2538. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.016. 4. Ochiai T, Oakley L, Sekhon N, et al. Risk of coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration in redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(22):2617-2627. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.022. 5. Makkar RR, Kapadia S, Chakravarty T, et al. Outcomes of repeat transcatheter aortic valve replacement with balloon-expandable valves: a registry study. Lancet. Published online August 31, 2023. 6. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695-1705. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1814052. 7. Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement in low-risk patients at five years. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(21):1949-1960. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2307447.